Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Artist mis-statements


I did some volunteer work last week, proofreading the catalog for the Surface Design Association's big show at Arrowmont this fall.  Based on what I read -- I saw only the words, not the pictures -- it looks like a great show and I will make sure that I see it in person.

My marching orders as a proofreader were to be flexible; "We would like to keep this as close to each artist's voice as possible," I was told.  If people spelled it "colour" or used varying degrees of formality, that was OK.  But I did flag misspellings (Minnesotta, anyone?) and outright grammatical errors.

I wasn't expecting to find as many grammatical errors as I did.  But what really surprised me was that almost all the errors were the same thing: subjects and verbs did not agree.  Would you believe that eight of the 91 artists committed this mistake?

I'll take off my proofreader's hat and put on my writing teacher's hat.  The reason educated people writing about serious subjects commit subject/verb errors is usually because their sentences are way too long and are way too grammatically complex.  Educated people don't say "the interplay determine how the work will look in the end."  But they might very well say "the interplay of disparate materials, of concept and making, and certainly emotion determine how the work will look in its ultimate incarnation."  There is so much padding in that sentence that by the time you get to the verb you've forgotten that the subject is "interplay," requiring a singular verb, not "materials, concept, making and emotion," which would require a plural verb.

(And if you were to take another step back, what does that sentence mean?  The idea, the emotion, the materials and the technique all influence the art.  Well duh.) 

I challenge you to look at your own artist statement.  Parse it for grammar.  Do not count on spell check to find your typos -- spell check is perfectly fine with a "limited addition" of prints, and it can't tell the difference between "its" and "it's." 

Then read your statement for sense.  Don't waste a lot of long, pretentious words telling us something that means nothing.  Think about what we, the audience, should know about you and your work.  Tell us something that will make us appreciate your work better, not something that will put us to sleep.


4 comments:

  1. You know to tell you the truth, I think its more about proofreading rather than not knowing the actual grammar rules. As a teacher, I've found that self-proofreading is really tough on people - me included. For me, I hear what I want to say in my head and don't even realize that what I've typed isn't exactly the right words. My mind just skips over the errors. For me what's a bigger issue - a huge issue - is the artist statement that to the average viewer is unclear. On more than one occasion, I'll read statements that are posted with pieces at a show out loud. They are so convoluted and laced with "artist speak" that everyone around me laughs. I imagine that was NOT the impression the artist wanted to make with the statement.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Having worked as a proofreader at two big daily newspapers, the first rule was: "never proofread your own writing" – it's almost impossible to see your own mistakes.
    Vancouver Barbara

    ReplyDelete
  3. HA! So appropriate that your post is about grammar on the same day that I send out a newsletter with an error in the headline. Mortified! Isn't it ALWAYS the headline?

    ReplyDelete