Showing posts with label modern quilting. Show all posts
Showing posts with label modern quilting. Show all posts

Monday, June 9, 2014

Modern quilting -- the show


I got a notice last week about QuiltCon, the big show sponsored by the Modern Quilt Guild that will be in Austin in February 2015.  I've written in the past about Modern Quilting and what it is, and my fascination with how MQ is different from what I do continues.  (I think it's different, but can't really tell.)

One clue to the things an institution values is how it structures the categories for its shows and awards, so I checked out the QuiltCon juried show info.

In addition to Applique, Fabric Challenge, Youth Quilts, and Group Quilts, definitions that seem pretty obvious, the show has categories for Handwork, Improvisation, Minimalist Design, Use of Negative Space, Piecing, and Modern Traditionalism.  You can enter only one quilt per category.

I can guess how they would judge Handwork, but the rest of them mystify me.  (Detailed category descriptions will appear on the website later.)  Much of my work, for instance, could easily be classified as piecing, improvisation, and minimalist design, and I guess most has some negative space.

More intriguing is trying to imagine the judges' thought process.  "Quilt A is by far the best in design, composition and color, but Quilt B has better negative space!"

The prize money isn't nearly as generous as at that other big quilt show in Texas -- $5000 for best in show, several $1000 prizes and $500 in each category -- but you might want to check it out.  Especially if you are good at negative space.























what do you think?  is this minimalist design?


Monday, May 20, 2013

Modern quilting -- read it now!

Last week I wrote about an article in the Wall Street Journal on Modern Quilting and said that unfortunately you have to be a WSJ subscriber to get the article online.  Messages on the Quiltart email list have pointed out that you can in fact find it, and I tried to provide those links for you.



UPDATE:  Well, folks, I am flummoxed.  Twice I have found the full article online (on different sites) by going to google and typing in "modern quilters stress simplicity, edgy subjects."  But on both occasions when I have tried to link there in my blog post, the link does not deliver you to the full article, just to the WSJ site with a subscriber access block.

If you really want to read the damn article, try the google search.   Try some of the links that show up on the search page and I hope you can find it.  And then I hope you think it's been worth the trouble.

Thanks, WSJ.  (Unlike the NYTimes, which allows nonsubscribers to read several free articles per month.)

Monday, May 13, 2013

Modern Quilting -- according to the Wall Street Journal

Last Friday's Wall Street Journal carried an article on our old favorite issue:  "Modern Quilters Stress Simplicity, Edgy Subjects."  Yes, it's Modern Quilting, which I wrote about a lot two years ago. It got to be a WSJ subject because Meg Cox, who used to work there, is a quilt aficionada and every now and then will write a story for them about her new interests.  Meg called me a couple of weeks ago and wanted to chat about my ideas on Modern Quilting, and she ended up quoting me in her story.

The news peg for this story was that Meg attended QuiltCon, the first national show of the Modern Quilt Guild, in February.  I had read about QuiltCon on various blogs at the time, and thought that it looked a lot like all the other big quilt shows, but apparently it was a bit different in its demographics.  "Instead of being clogged with electric mobility scooters, as in many quilting conferences, the aisles of QuiltCon... were full of strollers," Meg wrote in the article.  "This was a tech-savvy crowd: The show's organizers counted 2,000 tweets and 4,500 Instagram posts. A surprising number of the posts were about tattoos."

Meg liked something that I wrote in my blog two years ago and quoted it in the article:  "This New and Different Movement... is neither New nor Different."  She also quoted me as saying that I've seen nothing recently to change my mind on that opinion.

I wasn't the only crabby old quilter quoted in the article.  Holice Turnbow, a longtime fixture on the traditional quilting circuit and co-founder of the Hoffman Challenge, said, "Of the 50 attributes they list as modern, workmanship seems to be about 48."

In 2011, when I was trying hard to figure out exactly what Modern Quilting was, I ascertained that Modern Quilters wanted to break the rules.  Two years ago I was never able to learn just what rules they wanted to break, but now, thanks to the Wall Street Journal article, we have more info on that front.  Seems that the most talked-about quilts in the show were ones featuring our favorite four-letter word.

Give a F*ck, group quilt

Many people who attended the show blogged about these quilts and the consensus was that it was so courageous for the quilters to make them and for the show organizers to display them.  The purpose of the group quilt pictured above, according to the project organizer, Chawne Kimber, was to challenge the notion that some words must be censored from quilts.  (Yet she coyly spelled the quilt's title with an asterisk....)

So now we know that Modern Quilters want to break the rules about four-letter words.

Other quilts that caused comment at the show included one of a gun dripping blood.  With the institutional memory of an old lady, I point out that quilts about guns are nothing new; Bean Gilsdorf had two gun pieces in Quilt National, in 2003 and 2005, and in my humble opinion, they were more subtle and artistically noteworthy.

Bang You're Dead, Jacquie Gering (at QuiltCon )

Ouija #1, Bean Gilsdorf (Quilt National '03)

I'm sorry I can't provide a link to the entire article; the WSJ website is subscription-only.


Sunday, November 20, 2011

Modern quilting colors

Over the last few months I've been doing my best to keep you posted on my ongoing project to understand what Modern Quilting really is.  If you haven't been paying attention, so far we've established that Modern Quilters tend to be younger than non-modern quilters, that they want to Break The Rules, that they love gray and white among their colors, and that they like to depict their quilts artfully draped over furniture or shrubbery rather than photographed boringly head-on against a neutral background.

This week I was happy to read that several Modern Quilting gurus have shared with us their ideas of exciting color combinations

We all know that colors go in and out of fashion, just as patterns do.  A year or two ago I was crushed to discover that it's very difficult to buy striped fabric -- just when I had realized that stripes worked marvelously with my newly developed style of piecing.  I made a huge quilt that exhausted most of my stripe stash, and went out to buy more for a second quilt in warm colors, but oops, no stripes.  Plenty of polka dots, though.

Crazed 8: Incarceration, 2010 (detail)

Most fiber artists that I know don't spend much time in the quilt shop, however, making most of their own fabrics with various surface design techniques, whether dyeing, painting, screenprinting, discharging or whatever.  So maybe you will be as curious about what's hot these days as I was.

In a nutshell: gray and gray/beige, orange, mustard yellow, pink, warm dark red, grayed teal. 

Should fiber artists spend even a millisecond thinking about this?

Maybe not.  But then again, I was present in a room once when a Famous Artist was judging quilts in a juried show, and after some consideration, passed by a quilt that I thought was quite striking.  Why?  "Because the color palette is so old-fashioned, it just doesn't look fresh."  And if you, like me, are toying with the idea of doing an article or book or pattern or workshop that might appeal to quilters who do frequent quilt shops, perhaps you would like to think that your samples look fresh rather than old-fashioned. 

A few months ago you, my friends, pitched in and helped me win a contest in which I wrote about what I thought Modern Quilting meant.  My prize included a nice little pile of fabrics that, sure enough, fit in nicely with this new color vibe.  In furtherance of my own commercial development plan, which I'm not yet ready to go public with, I'm going to use some of these new trendy colors to make a quilt!  And since my stash dates back decades, I can probably go into my drawers and find a lot of fabrics that are just as trendy to go with these new ones, saved from the last time orange and gray went around.  When was that -- the 60s?  the 70s?  the 80s?  I can't remember.

Modern quilting fabrics on the left; my stash on the right.  If you're younger than I am and would like to save me from myself, please let me know which ones are mortifyingly old-fashioned.  Thank you!!!


Tuesday, September 6, 2011

THANK YOU!

Thanks to your votes, I won the essay contest on "What Is Modern Quilting?"  I told you Friday, when I asked for your support, that I knew we wouldn't win, because he younger people who love this movement and read this blog will outvote us, but this was a chance to stand up for our generation.  How nice to be wrong!

Now that I am famous, and perhaps about to be rich (not sure what they're going to send me as my huge prize), I will reflect again on what this movement seems to be. 

In discussion on the Quiltart list about this issue, Barb Pozek wrote, "Most of these quilters have grown up at a time when art education was hit or miss and Home Ec classes have thrown out sewing as a part of lessons.  Some might have been lucky to have a family member share their knowledge but they are very tech savvy, so their go-to place to learn is the internet."

And isn't it great that the internet allows them -- and us -- to connect with other like-minded people!  I've been using the internet in that fashion for about 15 years, but in that day, we didn't have blogs, we didn't have easily shared photos, so our connection was words-only.  Today it's far more feasible to learn your quilting entirely online, and I suspect that will make it more appealing to many time-challenged young people, especially those tethered with young children.

Barb again:  "It's also interesting that so many of the projects they create are very much home/ kid based. They are not creating art, they are interested in useful homemaking creations. Baby clothes, baby quilts, baby toys, kid clothes, and so on."

I don't find that at all surprising.  Recall your own young-mother days, how stressed and time-short your world was, and then contemplate that far more young mothers have jobs than we did.  The whole concept of "making art" is a luxury that most people in my generation came to only after our children left and we neared retirement. Making baby things was far more accessible and justifiable, a way to rationalize the time we stole to close the door and be alone for an hour or so of sewing therapy.

Barb's conclusion:  "Just to say they are MAKING anything is important to them and worth noting. They all have grown up in a time when making clothes did not save you money. Making things is a labor of love, not a matter of economic practicalities."
 
Excellent point: now that T shirts cost $3.99 and bed quilts from China cost $89 at WalMart, making your own things is no longer the low-end solution.  And what a burden the younger people have escaped because of that hard economic fact.  If they're making things for love, not for money, perhaps they'll be spared the frustrations that we older folks go through, where we give handmade gifts that are disrespected by our "loved ones," or sell our work at prices that translate to 10 cents an hour. 

The world changes, thank heavens, and even though the craft of cutting fabric into little pieces and sewing it back together is much the same as it was centuries ago, the mindset of the people who do it continues to mutate.  So even though we may feel amused and even smug at how the younger ones are discovering the same things we discovered many years ago, at the end of the day we should be delighted that they are learning and loving the craft/art that has brought us so much comfort and joy.




Sunday, September 4, 2011

More thoughts on Modern Quilting

I've stirred up a little storm this weekend by asking for your votes in the Modern Quilting essay contest, a pleasant little diversion on a hot summer weekend.  But some of the comments, both here and on the comments page where you vote in the essay contest, have made me think about what we all mean when we make quilts.

Here's a comment from Ana:  "I don't think this is so much about old ladies, but more about what people want out of their experience as quilters.  What I have seen of Modern Quilting is fun, very fresh, very basic and functional, but it is not trying to give messages or be art in the way that your quilts, or Nancy's, or Terry's, etc are. It is about homely, cosy and pretty. I really cannot see one of Nancy's quilts being a picnic rug for the kids.

"I for one love the not-so-precious attittude and generosity of this new lot and this is not to say that more serious quilters are precious and/or mean, but by being serious quilters they want a different end to their work.  My bottom line is: does it really matter? Do we all have to become artists and strive for more? Can some of us enjoy this wonderful craft just as a craft and aspire to have an end product that is just what it is: a quilt to snuggle under?"

Ana, I think you have perfectly described the motivation of many people who discover quilts and decide to learn to make them.  It perfectly describes me, several decades ago.  I didn't think of my quilts as art; they were functional and pretty.  I was scared to attempt quilting a bed-size piece, so I made lots of smaller quilts, both for babies and for grown-ups. 

Here's a quilt I made in 1973 (it says so in the corner) in my early mama days.  It managed to end up flat and sturdy despite being sparsely quilted without a walking foot, and has held up, performing its function, for all these years despite its miscellaneous fabric content.  I don't think we had actual batting in those days, so heaven knows what's inside it, the face fabrics are a mixture of fibers and textures, the backing and binding are of some godawful polyester blend.  But it's still here, on a chair in my bedroom, ready to pull over my shoulders or feet in the middle of the night if it gets a little cold.

This started out as a quilt for my sister-in-law as a Christmas present, but I had no idea what I was doing and cut way too many orange, yellow and white rectangles, so after her quilt was made and in the mail, I made this one out of what was left.  Experiences like this constituted my quilt learning process, so I always chuckle when I read about formulas, directions and apps to help you calculate exactly how much fabric to buy.  Heck, what's the fun of making a quilt if you have no leftovers?  But that's another story.

I totally agree with Ana that not everybody needs to be an artist.  And younger women who come to quilting as a craft, whether it's to have a hobby, or to make home decor, or to find companionship, may not ever think about their work in the same way that we Fiber Artistes do.  That's fine.  But my wish for quilting craftspeople is that they find a way to express creativity in their design as well as their execution.  Just because your quilt will end up under your kids' picnic doesn't mean you can't design it yourself, choose the fabrics yourself, and do more than "contract sewing" of somebody else's idea.

And until midnight tonight, there's still time for you to vote in the essay contest, if you haven't already.  Click here to get to the article, read the essays (mine is #3), then go back to the article and leave a comment.  Thank you!!

Friday, September 2, 2011

Vote for old ladies

I've written a couple of times recently about "Modern Quilting," a movement that seems wildly popular but difficult to define.  Several of you readers commented that it seemed reminiscent of the way we discovered quilting years ago when we were young, and that perhaps Modern Quilting is just a rebranding of a familiar old product to appeal to a younger demographic.

I promised to keep you posted on developments in my quest to get a handle on Modern Quilting, and that quest entails my regular reading of a new blog/magazine called Generation Q.  So Generation Q decided to have an essay contest, and I decided to enter.  Today the essays came up for votes, and I thought that in the spirit of shameless political pandering, which we seem to have a lot of this summer, I would ask for your votes.






















Vote for old ladies!  Vote for the integrity of our vision of quilting and the things we've learned over the years!  Vote for the wisdom of hard knocks and the value of experience!  Vote for age before beauty!  Vote for the rights of the younger generation to follow in our footsteps, including thinking they invented it! 

VOTE HERE -- click and leave a comment to choose Essay #3 (in case you couldn't figure it out by yourself...).  You have to vote by midnight Sunday, September 4.   Both you and I could be in for serious goodies if we win.

Of course we won't win.  The younger people who love this movement and read this blog will outvote us.  But perhaps we'll send a message, as political panderers always exhort their followers to do.  And just what would that message be?  Heck, I'm not sure.  Remember, I'm the one having a hard time defining it.

Thank you for your vote, and I also promise to protect Social Security and Medicare.

Monday, August 8, 2011

Modern quilting -- the big internet hoohah

After I wrote a few posts recently about Modern Quilting, one of my friends tipped me off to an article in the current Quilter's Newsletter Magazine, which I had not seen, on the same subject.  And she said, "If you do read it, I hope to read a discussion about it on your blog."

Not wanting to disappoint, I will do as she asked.

The QNM article, by Mary Kate Karr-Petras, grapples with some of the same issues I've been writing about -- how to define Modern Quilting, and why it is so popular among younger people.  She points to fabric choice as the key difference between Modern Quilters and Non-Modern Quilters -- "In contrast to reproductions and country-inspired calicoes popular through the 1990s, modern quilters gravitate to large-scale, home decor-inspired prints..."

And she identifies the internet as the "most important venue" of Modern Quilting, with bloggers and photo-sharing sites allowing people to make friends and be influenced by trends.  Only after some years of such online activity did Modern Quilters start to organize physical meetings and guilds, but there are now more than 100 chapters of the Modern Quilt Guild.

Karr-Petras alerts us to a big hoohah that occurred this spring when a blogger, Sandi Walton, posted a rant about Modern Quilting.  Walton was peeved because another blog said pinwheel blocks were challenging for intermediate to advanced quilters.  Walton begged to differ, they were actually quite simple.  But she intemperately titled her post "The dumbing-down of quilting," which predictably offended many people who did not bother to read the post, and some who did read it.

I am fascinated by the whole Modern Quilting movement, which I confess I didn't even know existed until a few weeks ago, and by the hoohah that got so many people hot under the collar.  I'm happy that apparently there are thousands of new, younger quilters out there becoming as enthralled by the magic of quilts as many of us old ladies have been for years.  I'm happy that so many entrepreneurs have found niches in this market, selling books, patterns, fabric and stuff to the new folks -- because money oils the wheels that also bring things to Unmodern Quilters like me.  But I too hope that the movement isn't dumbing down the pastime I love so much.

I was struck by some of the comments that were left on Walton's blog, because they seem to reinforce what I suspected already: that a lot of Modern Quilting boils down to We Don't Want to Hang Out With Old Ladies.  And from the evidence, I can't say I blame them.

Let me quote some of them:

Melinda:  "As someone who is new to the sewing community I find the quilting community very unfriendly to newbies. I sew for fun, not for the competition of it. I don’t care to be chided into developing new skills."

Kaye:  "We get snubbed all the time both on the internet and (most especially) in the "real world" ... Many of us are forming guilds so that we can have those relationships locally too, but unfortunately it isn't easy, especially when people are looking down their noses at you."

Amy:  "Someday I'll go to a class, or a quilt retreat, and maybe someday I'll have the time to shop for fabric without a grouchy sales lady rolling her eyes at my toddler.  But now I'm busy with more important things, and I love the simple quilts and the pretty pictures."

Wendy:  "What gets aggravating is going into my local quilt shop for some advice or help and getting sneered at because I'm doing the 'simple' blocks.  Yes, I'm doing 'simple' blocks because I like them. I like the more modern look.  I don't care to take the classes at my LQS to learn 'harder techniques' because the blocks and quilts they are making are ugly to me.  I don't criticize their quilts because I respect their taste, just wish they respected mine."

By happenstance, I wrote recently about local quilt and art stores going out of business, and how that strikes many of us as unfortunate.  But if local stores really treat the young quilters this badly, they are asking for their own demise.

Saturday, August 6, 2011

Modern quilting -- update

I've been intrigued with "modern quilting" and trying to define exactly what it is besides younger people who don't get particularly good vibes from quilting with older people.  Melody Johnson suggested in a comment that MQ tends to involve a lot more white, fewer muddy repro fabrics and less fiddly piecing of tiny bits that have to match at the corners.

I have more clues for you today.  Generation Q has a post about a block challenge in the Modern Quilt Guild, showing the four winning blocks from the Philadelphia chapter.  I thought they were all excellent and they were certainly different from the blocks you would have gotten if your regular middle-aged-and-up quilt guild were to do the same activity.

the winning block, by Monica Cuartero

The very existence of the challenge provides me with another piece of the definition of MQ.  The rules were to use fabrics from a certain designer line.  I have noticed that a lot of the MQ chatter has to do with designer fabric lines.  I find this fascination understandable among new quilters, who may not trust themselves to pick out fabrics that will go together. 

I do hope the newbies will outgrow designer lines as their own color and design sense matures, but acknowledge that choosing this particular design line for the challenge is a long step toward that goal.  The collection is much more adventurous and challenging than the matchy-matchy design lines seen in so many shops and immortalized in so many quilts made by older ladies.

I note that the designer whose line was chosen for the challenge was a Project Runway winner; not sure that would happen so much in old-lady quilt guilds.  I wonder how many young people have taken up sewing, whether garments or quilts, because of Project Runway!  I don't watch it myself, because there's too much drama and too little actual sewing, but I think it's great that the show has given needle arts a shot in the arm.


Thursday, July 28, 2011

The bottom line on modern quilting

Ever notice that occasionally you manage to one-up your kids on some aspect of trendy hipness?  Once in the last decade, for instance, we saw a new movie before our son the movie nut did.  Just last week we went to a hot new restaurant within days of its opening.  And now and then we utter a word or phrase that old people aren't supposed to know, and we even use it correctly in the sentence.  First the young people are surprised, and then they're impressed.  You can almost see the wheels turning in their heads as our reputations creak up a notch or two.  Heck, it's more fun than taking everybody out for dinner!

I've recently been made aware of a new thing called "modern quilting," and in the interest of perhaps surprising and impressing a young person at some future date by using the term correctly in a sentence, I'm trying to understand exactly what it is.  So I seized upon a recent post in Generation Q Magazine for more clues.  This post was a profile of Julie Herman, a young woman with a quilt business, selling patterns and stuff.  Her blog is engaging and her quilts are cheerful.

But we're looking for meaning, so here's the applicable part of the post:

"What modern means to Julie:  For me modern quilting is learning as many ways to do what’s possible and then choosing what’s best for you. Don’t make something because someone told you to or it's popular. Make it because it’s something you love and it’s your happy medium.”

That didn't provide much definition, so I went to Julie's website to check out her quilts.  And was surprised.  Remember, we established from previous clues that modern quilters want to break the rules.  But Julie's quilts don't break any rules that I ever heard of; they're simple, geometric, block-to-block, most based on traditional patterns, all the pieces cut with rulers and perfectly matched at the points and corners.  As far as I can see, they're made with impeccable technique, perfectly flat and beautifully bound.  And you can buy the pattern and make one almost exactly like hers.

She has an excellent eye for color, and sometimes puts together unconventional combinations (orange, aqua and gray looked particularly nice) or uses black to offset brights and lights. 

So what makes this modern quilting, other than the fact that Julie is 28?

After I wrote about modern quilting last week, one of my friends said in an email that she didn't understand what it is either.  "Didn't we already do this in the 60's & 70's??? ... There's a Modern Quilt Guild chapter in Portland (and there is one in Anchorage). From what I've seen in their blogs (show n tell), the quilts are pretty basic."

But as I think about it more, I realize that the modern quilting movement has much less to do with quilts than with quilting. In other words, the social aspect of the craft rather than the craft itself. This is not new, of course -- the quilting bee is one of the iconic images of early America -- but even at the quilting bee, don't you suppose the younger women liked to sneak off and talk about something different than their moms were gabbing about in the big room?


I think this New and Different Movement that's New and Different, but on closer examination proves to be neither New nor Different, boils down to We Don't Want to Hang Out With Old Ladies.  And I can sympathize with thet.

I'm delighted to see younger people enjoy the tradition and art form that I am so heavily invested in.  And much as we old people may think we're far wiser than young people, and have so much to teach them, I understand why it might be more fun for them to learn from one another, even if we might have a few more hard-won tricks of the trade to impart. 

Much as we love having younger people show up at our guilds and give us a jolt of energy, I understand why they might be turned off by our company.  Way too much talk about health problems and visiting the grandchildren, not enough interest in the challenges of starting a career and looking for love (been there, done that). 

My local fiber art group used to have a stitch-and-bitch in the mornings, and the most faithful participant was a twenty-something young woman who craved the companionship (she was self-employed and spent most of her time alone) and loved the craft.  Sometimes after the meeting broke up I would apologize to her, because the conversation had been so awful.  Now the same group has a young man on our board, and I apologize to him for the same reasons.  I know these younger people, especially the guys, must be rolling their eyes as much as threading their needles.

We like to think of ourselves as friendly and inclusive, but are we really?  I was chatting with a friend who attended a workshop at one of the big fiber art get-togethers earlier this summer.  She said it was populated by a core group of people who come every year, love seeing one another, and totally ignore everybody else on premises to the point of open rudeness.  And if a gray-haired woman feels this way, how do you think a twenty-something or a guy would take it?  No wonder they want a Movement of their own.

Tuesday, July 19, 2011

Modern quilting -- what is it?

I wrote last week about a new "blogzine," Generation Q Magazine, that is going to cover "modern quilting."  I'm intrigued by this concept, and wonder exactly what it is.  Last week we learned that in modern quilting there's "more going on than bold, graphic quilts with a lot of solids and wonky cuts."

This week we learn more.  "It’s about quilting that has a more contemporary aesthetic.... It’s for people who are interested in quilting that breaks the rules… we don’t want to be confined by tradition."

The article is framed as a phone conversation between the with-it 34-year-old heroine/writer and her painfully not-with-it mom, who keeps interrupting to wonder when daughter is going to get pregnant, worry that she's hanging out with lesbians and Democrats at the modern quilting guild, and report that at mom's good old-fashioned quilt guild, everybody has either a cane or a wheelchair. (I'm not making this up.)

Daughter eventually despairs at getting Mom to understand.   Finally she wails, "Look, I can’t explain to you what modern quilting is. But remember when you were in high school and the music you listened to started changing? And your parents didn’t understand it, because it wasn’t what they were used to, but you knew it wasn’t just different, it was yours? It was like it was meant for you. It fit you and your life and they way the world had changed since your parents were teenagers. And now you still love to rock out to Jerry Lee Lewis and Bill Haley, but you also love the crooners your parents listened to. You had your own thing, but it was based on what came before, and you embrace them both. It’s like that."


















Bill Haley and His Comets -- breaking the rules by standing on the bass

So if I can parse this explanation, I think that modern quilting is for young people who don't want to have much to do with old people and want to break the rules.  Plato and Socrates would recognize these yearnings, which were already kind of cliches three millenia back.

I'm not sure exactly which rules they want to break, or which traditions they find confining.  Still hoping to find out something a bit more specific, and still wondering whether by any chance anything about my own work and the work of other quilters I admire could be considered modern.  Since this is the internet and not a real quilt guild, the young folks wouldn't even have to find out that we're old. 

In case you don't want to read the blog every day, I'll keep an eye on it and let you know what I discover.


Saturday, July 16, 2011

Escaping from the little room

After I wrote about workshops, Mary Ann posted an intriguing comment:  "Is there anything new under the sun? ... To me the content is the message. But is you are doing strip or freeform piecing a la Nancy Crow, how much can you change the content? Or is it the coloring, the spacing, the stitching, whatever?"

When I read that comment, I thought of something else I read earlier this week.  There's a new "blogzine" called Generation Q Magazine, aimed at "those who love the modern and contemporary vibe in quilting, sewing and crafting."  In the second paragraph of the opening manifesto, the editors announce, "we just knew there was more going on than bold, graphic quilts with a lot of solids and wonky cuts."  Hmmm. I hadn't realized that bold, graphic quilts with a lot of solids are passe.  Guess I'll have to keep reading Generation Q to keep up to date.

So why did the first comment bring to mind the second?  I guess it's because in the minds of a lot of people, apparently, wonky piecing with solid colors and abstract design has become a precious little room of its own, with the name of Nancy Crow firmly inscribed on a plaque over the door.  Some people attach a second plaque, inscribed Gee's Bend, right next to it. 

In these minds, anybody who uses solid colors and cuts without a ruler is lumped together as doing the same thing.  I wonder if there's another school of quilt art, one where people use rulers and printed fabrics, and everybody who works that way is considered derivative of one another?

Back to Mary Ann's comment: I agree that the content is the message.  It's hard to discern content from abstract work, but you can get clues from the character of the composition and from the title and artist statement.  I think you can come up with radically different looks and content using "freeform piecing a la Nancy Crow." 

As evidence, I submit work from several artists who have studied with Nancy, and suggest that we're not all doing the same thing, nor are we doing work derivative of Nancy's.  I've also included a little about the content, as revealed in various artist statements.  See what you think.  Have we escaped from the little room and become our own people?

Exhibit A:  Bonnie Bucknam, Crater -- Best in Show, Quilt National '11
-- it's about geology and the landscape

Exhibit B:  Leslie Riley, Broken Fence, in Quilt National '11 --  " I layer the complex relationships of form and color to create a dense image"

Exhibit C:  Uta Lenk, Linienspiel X, in Color Improvisations traveling exhibit -- her quilts are inspired by drawings by her 2-year-old son

Exhibit D:  Terry Jarrard-Dimond, Figure in Brown,  in Color Improvisations traveling exhibit -- she sees the large shapes as entities with personalities, and calls her compositions "interior landscapes" based on life experiences

Exhibit E: Judy Kirpich, Circles, in Quilt National '11 --  it's about "the tension I have felt during the last two years of economic turmoil in our country"

Exhibit F:  Kathleen Loomis, Fault Lines 4, in Quilt National '11 -- it's about  "our society and our environment under extreme tension, starting to come apart, and the fragility of the bonds that hold things in place"